SADAREM

Government Of Andhra Pradesh
Rural Development Department SERP
SADAREM
(Software for Assessment Of Disabled For Access Rehabilitation and Empowerment)
SADAREM Assessment And Pension status as on:

Mandal Level Report

District : East Godavari Mandal :Rajahmundry (urban) Village :ALL

Excel Back

S.No	Village	PwDs - ASSESSMENT STATUS				PwDs - PENSIONS COVERED
S.No	Village	Total Applied	Assessed	Rejected (4-6)	Eligible (>40%) (4-5)	Physical Impairment	Visual Impairment	Hearing Impairment	Mental Retardation	Mental Illness	Multiple Disability	Total Pensioners (7+8+9+10+11+12)	Certificate Pendency Percentage
1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14
Total		10,332	8,312	1,000	7,312	1,578	223	224	313	31	48	2,417	2,020(19.55)%
1	10th Ward	366	299	45	254	63	2	3	5	0	0	73	67(18.31)%
2	11th Ward	201	171	18	153	15	0	6	8	0	0	29	30(14.93)%
3	12th Ward	171	144	9	135	20	2	2	10	1	0	35	27(15.79)%
4	13th Ward	166	139	21	118	28	3	3	7	0	1	42	27(16.27)%
5	14th Ward	177	146	17	129	30	2	3	1	0	0	36	31(17.51)%
6	15th Ward	203	155	21	134	17	1	3	6	0	0	27	48(23.65)%
7	16th Ward	344	271	26	245	48	7	9	15	0	2	81	73(21.22)%
8	17th Ward	285	211	24	187	43	4	3	10	1	3	64	74(25.96)%
9	18th Ward	161	136	13	123	19	2	4	2	0	3	30	25(15.53)%
10	19th Ward	197	158	25	133	17	5	4	2	1	0	29	39(19.80)%
11	1st Ward	267	211	33	178	19	7	4	4	0	1	35	56(20.97)%
12	20th Ward	247	191	27	164	53	10	4	11	3	1	82	56(22.67)%
13	21st Ward	138	126	10	116	28	2	6	7	1	1	45	12(8.70)%
14	22nd Ward	151	117	14	103	23	3	3	3	0	0	32	34(22.52)%
15	23rd Ward	136	115	21	94	14	1	3	2	0	0	20	21(15.44)%
16	24th Ward	201	168	17	151	30	5	3	9	2	3	52	33(16.42)%
17	25th Ward	165	141	16	125	34	3	7	4	3	1	52	24(14.55)%
18	26th Ward	140	131	18	113	17	4	1	4	0	1	27	9(6.43)%
19	27th Ward	257	202	23	179	49	2	2	7	0	0	60	55(21.40)%
20	28th Ward	171	144	23	121	32	2	3	7	4	0	48	27(15.79)%
21	29th Ward	210	169	18	151	31	2	3	5	0	0	41	41(19.52)%
22	2nd Ward	297	253	29	224	50	11	14	12	0	4	91	44(14.81)%
23	30th Ward	256	208	18	190	59	7	10	3	1	2	82	48(18.75)%
24	31st Ward	205	163	19	144	32	2	2	5	1	2	44	42(20.49)%
25	32nd Ward	177	151	19	132	20	5	0	6	0	0	31	26(14.69)%
26	33rd Ward	107	76	11	65	7	0	4	0	0	1	12	31(28.97)%
27	34th Ward	222	173	19	154	46	4	5	7	1	0	63	49(22.07)%
28	35th Ward	195	153	13	140	37	8	3	5	0	1	54	42(21.54)%
29	36th Ward	237	178	22	156	28	4	6	16	0	3	57	59(24.89)%
30	37th Ward	216	154	21	133	34	4	6	6	0	0	50	62(28.70)%
31	38th Ward	192	153	14	139	27	7	3	6	2	2	47	39(20.31)%
32	39th Ward	238	194	24	170	44	10	4	4	1	4	67	44(18.49)%
33	3rd Ward	258	196	24	172	47	3	7	13	0	2	72	62(24.03)%
34	40th Ward	264	213	33	180	41	4	7	11	0	0	63	51(19.32)%
35	41st Ward	204	159	19	140	32	8	8	7	0	0	55	45(22.06)%
36	42nd Ward	206	181	14	167	29	6	7	6	0	1	49	25(12.14)%
37	43rd Ward	134	114	15	99	10	0	0	5	0	0	15	20(14.93)%
38	44th Ward	146	127	14	113	36	4	2	4	3	2	51	19(13.01)%
39	45th Ward	187	137	19	118	28	7	4	6	1	2	48	50(26.74)%
40	46th Ward	248	175	15	160	40	4	14	6	0	0	64	73(29.44)%
41	47th Ward	196	164	22	142	40	12	4	3	0	0	59	32(16.33)%
42	48th Ward	237	185	29	156	56	4	2	5	0	0	67	52(21.94)%
43	49th Ward	290	237	34	203	48	5	8	10	3	1	75	53(18.28)%
44	4th Ward	191	147	22	125	32	7	2	12	0	1	54	44(23.04)%
45	50th Ward	243	196	21	175	29	4	3	2	0	0	38	47(19.34)%
46	5th Ward	157	114	10	104	14	3	3	6	0	0	26	43(27.39)%
47	6th Ward	225	194	19	175	37	9	9	6	1	1	63	31(13.78)%
48	7th Ward	137	119	8	111	10	5	5	5	0	1	26	18(13.14)%
49	8th Ward	131	107	13	94	12	1	1	1	0	0	15	24(18.32)%
50	9th Ward	182	146	21	125	23	6	2	6	1	1	39	36(19.78)%

Designed, Developed & Maintained by