SADAREM

Government Of Andhra Pradesh
Rural Development Department SERP
SADAREM
(Software for Assessment Of Disabled For Access Rehabilitation and Empowerment)
SADAREM Assessment And Pension status as on:

Mandal Level Report

District : Guntur Mandal :Guntur Municipal Corporation Village :ALL

Excel Back

S.No	Village	PwDs - ASSESSMENT STATUS				PwDs - PENSIONS COVERED
S.No	Village	Total Applied	Assessed	Rejected (4-6)	Eligible (>40%) (4-5)	Physical Impairment	Visual Impairment	Hearing Impairment	Mental Retardation	Mental Illness	Multiple Disability	Total Pensioners (7+8+9+10+11+12)	Certificate Pendency Percentage
1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14
Total		13,970	11,325	1,063	10,262	1,622	204	240	344	6	1	2,417	2,645(18.93)%
1	10th Ward	356	305	30	275	25	5	3	6	0	0	39	51(14.33)%
2	11th Ward	222	181	21	160	29	3	3	4	0	0	39	41(18.47)%
3	12th Ward	272	226	25	201	34	4	3	14	0	0	55	46(16.91)%
4	13th Ward	257	208	13	195	39	2	4	7	0	0	52	49(19.07)%
5	14th Ward	242	180	19	161	23	3	5	3	0	0	34	62(25.62)%
6	15th Ward	455	331	45	286	57	1	8	14	0	0	80	124(27.25)%
7	16th Ward	281	232	18	214	41	5	7	19	0	0	72	49(17.44)%
8	17th Ward	431	345	44	301	47	4	5	6	0	0	62	86(19.95)%
9	18th Ward	366	302	37	265	55	10	10	7	0	1	83	64(17.49)%
10	19th Ward	332	262	25	237	35	5	11	3	0	0	54	70(21.08)%
11	1st Ward	451	361	39	322	41	1	2	4	0	0	48	90(19.96)%
12	20th Ward	383	319	30	289	34	6	3	12	0	0	55	64(16.71)%
13	21st Ward	282	236	22	214	34	2	9	11	0	0	56	46(16.31)%
14	22nd Ward	277	238	25	213	30	4	6	5	0	0	45	39(14.08)%
15	23rd Ward	221	188	22	166	16	1	1	5	0	0	23	33(14.93)%
16	24th Ward	271	212	22	190	38	6	2	7	0	0	53	59(21.77)%
17	25th Ward	353	281	21	260	38	3	2	15	0	0	58	72(20.40)%
18	26th Ward	305	255	18	237	21	6	1	10	0	0	38	50(16.39)%
19	27th Ward	243	200	10	190	47	7	5	5	0	0	64	43(17.70)%
20	28th Ward	242	194	21	173	29	2	5	5	1	0	42	48(19.83)%
21	29th Ward	287	221	23	198	26	1	3	6	0	0	36	66(23.00)%
22	2nd Ward	314	268	19	249	43	5	9	11	2	0	70	46(14.65)%
23	30th Ward	233	188	17	171	26	2	3	2	1	0	34	45(19.31)%
24	31st Ward	160	133	9	124	15	4	6	4	0	0	29	27(16.87)%
25	32nd Ward	234	197	16	181	30	6	6	13	0	0	55	37(15.81)%
26	33rd Ward	224	190	10	180	43	6	9	9	0	0	67	34(15.18)%
27	34th Ward	235	200	20	180	14	1	3	0	0	0	18	35(14.89)%
28	35th Ward	115	97	5	92	8	1	1	0	0	0	10	18(15.65)%
29	36th Ward	189	154	14	140	12	2	4	0	1	0	19	35(18.52)%
30	37th Ward	131	110	9	101	6	2	1	1	1	0	11	21(16.03)%
31	38th Ward	220	175	20	155	25	3	2	3	0	0	33	45(20.45)%
32	39th Ward	234	167	23	144	14	4	2	5	0	0	25	67(28.63)%
33	3rd Ward	421	354	32	322	41	5	11	11	0	0	68	67(15.91)%
34	40th Ward	140	116	9	107	5	3	4	5	0	0	17	24(17.14)%
35	41st Ward	342	266	31	235	37	5	7	2	0	0	51	76(22.22)%
36	42nd Ward	134	112	13	99	7	2	3	2	0	0	14	22(16.42)%
37	43rd Ward	177	144	11	133	25	3	5	6	0	0	39	33(18.64)%
38	44th Ward	153	123	9	114	27	2	0	6	0	0	35	30(19.61)%
39	45th Ward	177	138	8	130	29	2	10	4	0	0	45	39(22.03)%
40	46th Ward	237	196	18	178	41	5	2	6	0	0	54	41(17.30)%
41	47th Ward	397	318	34	284	40	5	3	11	0	0	59	79(19.90)%
42	48th Ward	357	287	30	257	50	6	9	8	0	0	73	70(19.61)%
43	49th Ward	247	196	19	177	36	5	3	8	0	0	52	51(20.65)%
44	4th Ward	252	212	11	201	33	2	1	4	0	0	40	40(15.87)%
45	50th Ward	294	247	30	217	29	3	1	6	0	0	39	47(15.99)%
46	51st Ward	247	179	22	157	26	1	2	3	0	0	32	68(27.53)%
47	52nd Ward	292	221	21	200	31	3	1	3	0	0	38	71(24.32)%
48	5th Ward	279	229	11	218	24	5	5	10	0	0	44	50(17.92)%
49	6th Ward	321	265	17	248	54	15	6	17	0	0	92	56(17.45)%
50	7th Ward	263	230	15	215	46	5	10	6	0	0	67	33(12.55)%
51	8th Ward	170	140	11	129	21	1	6	2	0	0	30	30(17.65)%
52	9th Ward	252	196	19	177	45	9	7	8	0	0	69	56(22.22)%

Designed, Developed & Maintained by