SADAREM

Government Of Andhra Pradesh
Rural Development Department SERP
SADAREM
(Software for Assessment Of Disabled For Access Rehabilitation and Empowerment)
SADAREM Assessment And Pension status as on:

Mandal Level Report

District : Guntur Mandal :Mangalagiri Municipality Village :ALL

Excel Back

S.No	Village	PwDs - ASSESSMENT STATUS				PwDs - PENSIONS COVERED
S.No	Village	Total Applied	Assessed	Rejected (4-6)	Eligible (>40%) (4-5)	Physical Impairment	Visual Impairment	Hearing Impairment	Mental Retardation	Mental Illness	Multiple Disability	Total Pensioners (7+8+9+10+11+12)	Certificate Pendency Percentage
1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14
Total		1,350	1,059	96	963	280	40	43	45	1	0	409	291(21.56)%
1	10th Ward	37	29	4	25	8	0	0	0	0	0	8	8(21.62)%
2	11th Ward	34	29	0	29	13	0	1	1	0	0	15	5(14.71)%
3	12th Ward	41	34	3	31	8	1	1	1	0	0	11	7(17.07)%
4	13th Ward	42	31	4	27	9	1	0	3	0	0	13	11(26.19)%
5	14th Ward	26	23	1	22	4	2	3	1	0	0	10	3(11.54)%
6	15th Ward	36	28	2	26	10	0	2	1	0	0	13	8(22.22)%
7	16th Ward	22	18	3	15	5	0	1	0	0	0	6	4(18.18)%
8	17th Ward	54	46	5	41	11	1	0	2	0	0	14	8(14.81)%
9	18th Ward	43	34	4	30	8	1	2	0	0	0	11	9(20.93)%
10	19th Ward	37	29	0	29	9	2	3	2	0	0	16	8(21.62)%
11	1st Ward	45	34	0	34	9	0	2	1	0	0	12	11(24.44)%
12	20th Ward	43	40	2	38	10	4	2	5	0	0	21	3(6.98)%
13	21st Ward	47	40	6	34	6	1	1	0	0	0	8	7(14.89)%
14	22nd Ward	76	57	6	51	13	2	2	1	0	0	18	19(25.00)%
15	23rd Ward	40	35	5	30	8	1	3	3	0	0	15	5(12.50)%
16	24th Ward	46	40	1	39	15	0	2	1	0	0	18	6(13.04)%
17	25th Ward	31	22	2	20	3	3	1	3	0	0	10	9(29.03)%
18	26th Ward	39	31	3	28	7	0	4	4	1	0	16	8(20.51)%
19	27th Ward	82	60	9	51	17	2	2	1	0	0	22	22(26.83)%
20	28th Ward	58	44	7	37	8	1	0	2	0	0	11	14(24.14)%
21	29th Ward	53	43	5	38	12	1	2	2	0	0	17	10(18.87)%
22	2nd Ward	44	33	1	32	8	1	0	2	0	0	11	11(25.00)%
23	30th Ward	32	22	1	21	4	1	1	0	0	0	6	10(31.25)%
24	31st Ward	47	31	3	28	12	4	0	2	0	0	18	16(34.04)%
25	32nd Ward	44	29	2	27	13	5	2	0	0	0	20	15(34.09)%
26	3rd Ward	32	27	2	25	10	0	1	1	0	0	12	5(15.62)%
27	4th Ward	42	32	2	30	14	4	0	0	0	0	18	10(23.81)%
28	5th Ward	27	23	5	18	3	2	1	2	0	0	8	4(14.81)%
29	6th Ward	44	30	1	29	8	0	1	0	0	0	9	14(31.82)%
30	7th Ward	11	9	1	8	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2(18.18)%
31	8th Ward	45	36	1	35	5	0	3	2	0	0	10	9(20.00)%
32	9th Ward	50	40	5	35	10	0	0	2	0	0	12	10(20.00)%

Designed, Developed & Maintained by