SADAREM

Government Of Andhra Pradesh
Rural Development Department SERP
SADAREM
(Software for Assessment Of Disabled For Access Rehabilitation and Empowerment)
SADAREM Assessment And Pension status as on:

Mandal Level Report

District : S P S Nellore Mandal :Nellore (urban) Village :ALL

Excel Back

S.No	Village	PwDs - ASSESSMENT STATUS				PwDs - PENSIONS COVERED
S.No	Village	Total Applied	Assessed	Rejected (4-6)	Eligible (>40%) (4-5)	Physical Impairment	Visual Impairment	Hearing Impairment	Mental Retardation	Mental Illness	Multiple Disability	Total Pensioners (7+8+9+10+11+12)	Certificate Pendency Percentage
1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14
Total		11,435	8,595	1,188	7,407	1,065	281	288	258	10	15	1,917	2,840(24.84)%
1	10th Ward	267	208	30	178	12	3	7	5	0	0	27	59(22.10)%
2	11th Ward	217	181	24	157	22	6	5	3	0	0	36	36(16.59)%
3	12th Ward	167	134	22	112	17	11	4	7	0	0	39	33(19.76)%
4	13th Ward	191	139	13	126	18	6	10	4	0	0	38	52(27.23)%
5	14th Ward	204	148	20	128	16	5	3	2	0	0	26	56(27.45)%
6	15th Ward	246	195	28	167	7	5	8	1	0	0	21	51(20.73)%
7	16th Ward	221	186	20	166	12	5	6	5	0	1	29	35(15.84)%
8	17th Ward	148	112	20	92	19	4	4	0	0	0	27	36(24.32)%
9	18th Ward	171	115	20	95	16	1	3	6	0	0	26	56(32.75)%
10	19th Ward	193	161	15	146	21	2	9	3	0	0	35	32(16.58)%
11	1st Ward	435	296	45	251	38	17	10	13	1	1	80	139(31.95)%
12	20th Ward	302	252	32	220	24	13	7	6	0	0	50	50(16.56)%
13	21st Ward	261	166	17	149	12	5	4	4	0	0	25	95(36.40)%
14	22nd Ward	207	162	26	136	14	7	2	8	0	0	31	45(21.74)%
15	23rd Ward	371	278	54	224	17	7	4	6	0	0	34	93(25.07)%
16	24th Ward	433	307	38	269	40	7	6	8	0	1	62	126(29.10)%
17	25th Ward	446	379	42	337	49	9	14	10	0	2	84	67(15.02)%
18	26th Ward	342	288	40	248	18	3	5	4	0	0	30	54(15.79)%
19	27th Ward	261	222	29	193	21	5	7	7	0	0	40	39(14.94)%
20	28th Ward	231	181	21	160	8	1	1	3	0	0	13	50(21.65)%
21	29th Ward	234	161	24	137	34	11	13	3	0	0	61	73(31.20)%
22	2nd Ward	239	178	19	159	40	11	5	11	0	0	67	61(25.52)%
23	30th Ward	222	158	25	133	15	2	8	1	0	0	26	64(28.83)%
24	31st Ward	235	169	32	137	16	7	6	9	0	0	38	66(28.09)%
25	32nd Ward	195	147	17	130	19	1	7	6	0	0	33	48(24.62)%
26	33rd Ward	165	122	21	101	19	4	5	6	0	0	34	43(26.06)%
27	34th Ward	147	106	18	88	15	1	2	2	1	0	21	41(27.89)%
28	35th Ward	169	118	10	108	12	3	5	5	0	0	25	51(30.18)%
29	36th Ward	160	105	11	94	23	0	7	2	1	0	33	55(34.37)%
30	37th Ward	125	78	7	71	13	0	1	3	0	0	17	47(37.60)%
31	38th Ward	96	66	9	57	4	1	4	1	0	2	12	30(31.25)%
32	39th Ward	134	95	9	86	18	6	6	10	1	1	42	39(29.10)%
33	3rd Ward	288	222	27	195	37	3	6	7	0	0	53	66(22.92)%
34	40th Ward	110	84	10	74	15	4	1	4	0	1	25	26(23.64)%
35	41st Ward	147	111	18	93	13	8	6	3	0	0	30	36(24.49)%
36	42nd Ward	193	147	19	128	29	7	5	5	0	0	46	46(23.83)%
37	43rd Ward	141	103	13	90	17	1	1	2	0	0	21	38(26.95)%
38	44th Ward	213	151	9	142	38	14	15	10	0	0	77	62(29.11)%
39	45th Ward	110	73	10	63	17	2	7	5	2	1	34	37(33.64)%
40	46th Ward	73	51	8	43	6	5	1	5	0	1	18	22(30.14)%
41	47th Ward	191	136	13	123	20	8	7	1	1	0	37	55(28.80)%
42	48th Ward	185	127	26	101	21	11	6	12	1	1	52	58(31.35)%
43	49th Ward	208	142	25	117	36	7	8	5	0	0	56	66(31.73)%
44	4th Ward	305	233	23	210	33	8	8	11	0	0	60	72(23.61)%
45	50th Ward	497	361	72	289	22	8	4	7	0	0	41	136(27.36)%
46	5th Ward	226	170	27	143	27	6	6	4	1	1	45	56(24.78)%
47	6th Ward	234	179	23	156	27	4	3	4	1	1	40	55(23.50)%
48	7th Ward	267	204	32	172	25	8	2	2	0	0	37	63(23.60)%
49	8th Ward	217	164	29	135	14	3	3	0	0	0	20	53(24.42)%
50	9th Ward	395	324	46	278	39	5	11	7	0	1	63	71(17.97)%

Designed, Developed & Maintained by