SADAREM

Government Of Andhra Pradesh
Rural Development Department SERP
SADAREM
(Software for Assessment Of Disabled For Access Rehabilitation and Empowerment)
SADAREM Assessment And Pension status as on:

Mandal Level Report

District : S P S Nellore Mandal :Gudur (urban) Village :ALL

Excel Back

S.No	Village	PwDs - ASSESSMENT STATUS				PwDs - PENSIONS COVERED
S.No	Village	Total Applied	Assessed	Rejected (4-6)	Eligible (>40%) (4-5)	Physical Impairment	Visual Impairment	Hearing Impairment	Mental Retardation	Mental Illness	Multiple Disability	Total Pensioners (7+8+9+10+11+12)	Certificate Pendency Percentage
1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14
Total		1,819	1,375	176	1,199	230	34	87	55	5	4	415	444(24.41)%
1	10th Ward	77	69	13	56	9	4	0	3	0	1	17	8(10.39)%
2	11th Ward	51	39	3	36	4	1	1	3	0	0	9	12(23.53)%
3	12th Ward	42	27	6	21	3	1	2	2	0	0	8	15(35.71)%
4	13th Ward	58	38	4	34	10	0	1	1	1	0	13	20(34.48)%
5	14th Ward	49	42	4	38	7	2	3	2	0	0	14	7(14.29)%
6	15th Ward	55	48	4	44	3	1	2	7	0	0	13	7(12.73)%
7	16th Ward	26	19	5	14	3	0	1	0	0	0	4	7(26.92)%
8	17th Ward	29	20	2	18	3	2	0	1	0	0	6	9(31.03)%
9	18th Ward	52	41	10	31	11	1	7	1	1	0	21	11(21.15)%
10	19th Ward	47	38	3	35	10	0	3	1	0	0	14	9(19.15)%
11	1st Ward	135	107	18	89	18	2	6	1	0	0	27	28(20.74)%
12	20th Ward	39	24	1	23	7	0	4	0	0	0	11	15(38.46)%
13	21st Ward	49	38	3	35	7	1	1	1	0	0	10	11(22.45)%
14	22nd Ward	37	30	4	26	4	0	4	4	1	0	13	7(18.92)%
15	23rd Ward	30	24	3	21	3	0	0	0	0	0	3	6(20.00)%
16	24th Ward	50	41	6	35	3	0	0	1	0	0	4	9(18.00)%
17	25th Ward	77	63	7	56	10	0	4	3	0	0	17	14(18.18)%
18	26th Ward	37	27	3	24	4	3	2	0	0	0	9	10(27.03)%
19	27th Ward	30	26	4	22	4	0	0	1	0	0	5	4(13.33)%
20	28th Ward	53	33	3	30	5	3	3	0	0	0	11	20(37.74)%
21	29th Ward	47	34	6	28	7	0	3	2	1	0	13	13(27.66)%
22	2nd Ward	94	70	10	60	8	1	7	2	0	0	18	24(25.53)%
23	30th Ward	34	27	7	20	7	1	2	0	0	0	10	7(20.59)%
24	31th Ward	39	27	7	20	3	2	2	1	0	0	8	12(30.77)%
25	32th Ward	45	34	3	31	3	2	4	0	1	0	10	11(24.44)%
26	33th Ward	52	30	1	29	9	0	2	0	0	0	11	22(42.31)%
27	3rd Ward	80	67	9	58	7	1	3	0	0	1	12	13(16.25)%
28	4th Ward	56	37	2	35	10	1	2	3	0	0	16	19(33.93)%
29	5th Ward	69	57	6	51	9	1	2	1	0	0	13	12(17.39)%
30	6th Ward	67	47	4	43	11	1	1	3	0	0	16	20(29.85)%
31	7th Ward	112	73	9	64	11	2	8	5	0	1	27	39(34.82)%
32	8th Ward	45	38	2	36	6	0	3	1	0	1	11	7(15.56)%
33	9th Ward	56	40	4	36	11	1	4	5	0	0	21	16(28.57)%

Designed, Developed & Maintained by