SADAREM

Government Of Andhra Pradesh
Rural Development Department SERP
SADAREM
(Software for Assessment Of Disabled For Access Rehabilitation and Empowerment)
SADAREM Assessment And Pension status as on:

Mandal Level Report

District : Anantapur Mandal :Anantapur (urban) Village :ALL

Excel Back

S.No	Village	PwDs - ASSESSMENT STATUS				PwDs - PENSIONS COVERED
S.No	Village	Total Applied	Assessed	Rejected (4-6)	Eligible (>40%) (4-5)	Physical Impairment	Visual Impairment	Hearing Impairment	Mental Retardation	Mental Illness	Multiple Disability	Total Pensioners (7+8+9+10+11+12)	Certificate Pendency Percentage
1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14
Total		10,948	7,939	809	7,130	1,303	203	307	413	7	3	2,236	3,009(27.48)%
1	10th Ward	309	175	32	143	27	9	4	4	1	0	45	134(43.37)%
2	11th Ward	511	411	46	365	48	8	24	13	1	0	94	100(19.57)%
3	12th Ward	502	412	48	364	40	8	15	12	0	0	75	90(17.93)%
4	13th Ward	399	319	27	292	42	5	7	9	1	0	64	80(20.05)%
5	14th Ward	234	137	9	128	43	8	9	12	0	0	72	97(41.45)%
6	15th Ward	118	80	6	74	12	2	2	4	0	0	20	38(32.20)%
7	16th Ward	255	225	20	205	27	4	10	7	0	0	48	30(11.76)%
8	17th Ward	300	251	29	222	44	2	3	5	0	0	54	49(16.33)%
9	18th Ward	272	234	16	218	25	1	10	5	0	0	41	38(13.97)%
10	19th Ward	677	560	65	495	82	7	14	18	1	0	122	117(17.28)%
11	1st Ward	543	435	35	400	57	13	9	19	0	0	98	108(19.89)%
12	20th Ward	195	122	10	112	21	6	10	10	0	0	47	73(37.44)%
13	21st Ward	168	87	7	80	16	3	6	4	0	0	29	81(48.21)%
14	22nd Ward	193	133	14	119	27	8	17	18	0	0	70	60(31.09)%
15	23rd Ward	223	135	12	123	40	4	10	20	0	0	74	88(39.46)%
16	24th Ward	209	138	15	123	42	3	5	14	0	0	64	71(33.97)%
17	25th Ward	152	102	9	93	23	2	4	3	0	0	32	50(32.89)%
18	26th Ward	109	71	10	61	16	3	7	3	0	0	29	38(34.86)%
19	27th Ward	168	136	12	124	17	4	4	4	1	1	31	32(19.05)%
20	28th Ward	671	571	55	516	54	12	24	14	0	0	104	100(14.90)%
21	29th Ward	88	55	3	52	19	3	5	11	0	0	38	33(37.50)%
22	2nd Ward	272	171	19	152	26	5	1	12	0	0	44	101(37.13)%
23	30th Ward	46	26	3	23	2	0	1	1	0	0	4	20(43.48)%
24	31st Ward	116	67	5	62	24	2	3	10	0	0	39	49(42.24)%
25	32nd Ward	74	42	7	35	7	0	2	3	0	0	12	32(43.24)%
26	33rd Ward	102	57	5	52	16	1	4	6	0	0	27	45(44.12)%
27	34th Ward	99	62	7	55	14	2	1	7	0	0	24	37(37.37)%
28	35th Ward	136	76	11	65	10	3	1	4	0	0	18	60(44.12)%
29	36th Ward	127	75	7	68	26	4	3	11	0	0	44	52(40.94)%
30	37 Ward	78	46	4	42	8	0	0	4	0	0	12	32(41.03)%
31	38 Ward	147	88	6	82	19	2	0	3	0	0	24	59(40.14)%
32	39th Ward	115	73	8	65	4	4	4	10	0	0	22	42(36.52)%
33	3rd Ward	189	138	15	123	15	1	4	2	1	0	23	51(26.98)%
34	40th Ward	161	83	11	72	22	5	3	6	0	0	36	78(48.45)%
35	41st Ward	202	115	21	94	21	2	3	5	0	0	31	87(43.07)%
36	42nd Ward	202	101	15	86	23	5	4	14	0	0	46	101(50.00)%
37	43rd Ward	114	76	11	65	25	2	2	10	0	0	39	38(33.33)%
38	44th Ward	55	40	9	31	12	3	2	3	0	0	20	15(27.27)%
39	45th Ward	99	55	2	53	11	2	7	3	0	0	23	44(44.44)%
40	46th Ward	94	63	4	59	11	4	7	10	0	0	32	31(32.98)%
41	47th Ward	113	71	12	59	19	3	1	2	1	0	26	42(37.17)%
42	48th Ward	73	45	3	42	15	1	3	2	0	0	21	28(38.36)%
43	49th Ward	130	77	6	71	18	1	1	5	0	0	25	53(40.77)%
44	4th Ward	332	294	39	255	35	6	4	5	0	0	50	38(11.45)%
45	50th Ward	135	91	6	85	15	4	8	15	0	0	42	44(32.59)%
46	5th Ward	202	162	19	143	26	2	5	8	0	1	42	40(19.80)%
47	6th Ward	639	550	47	503	52	6	14	10	0	0	82	89(13.93)%
48	7th Ward	185	146	7	139	31	6	4	8	0	1	50	39(21.08)%
49	8th Ward	198	130	10	120	34	3	7	10	0	0	54	68(34.34)%
50	9th Ward	217	130	10	120	40	9	9	15	0	0	73	87(40.09)%

Designed, Developed & Maintained by