SADAREM

Government Of Andhra Pradesh
Rural Development Department SERP
SADAREM
(Software for Assessment Of Disabled For Access Rehabilitation and Empowerment)
SADAREM Assessment And Pension status as on:

Mandal Level Report

District : Kurnool Mandal :Kurnool (urban) Village :ALL

Excel Back

S.No	Village	PwDs - ASSESSMENT STATUS				PwDs - PENSIONS COVERED
S.No	Village	Total Applied	Assessed	Rejected (4-6)	Eligible (>40%) (4-5)	Physical Impairment	Visual Impairment	Hearing Impairment	Mental Retardation	Mental Illness	Multiple Disability	Total Pensioners (7+8+9+10+11+12)	Certificate Pendency Percentage
1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14
Total		10,646	7,697	1,311	6,386	1,811	179	228	344	1	0	2,563	2,949(27.70)%
1	10th Ward	168	120	23	97	19	1	2	5	0	0	27	48(28.57)%
2	11th Ward	243	167	28	139	44	2	6	8	0	0	60	76(31.28)%
3	12th Ward	174	112	17	95	31	0	8	3	0	0	42	62(35.63)%
4	13th Ward	237	177	25	152	46	9	4	12	0	0	71	60(25.32)%
5	14th Ward	168	110	11	99	31	1	2	3	0	0	37	58(34.52)%
6	15th Ward	226	172	39	133	49	3	2	11	0	0	65	54(23.89)%
7	16th Ward	216	152	24	128	40	3	5	5	0	0	53	64(29.63)%
8	17th Ward	223	161	19	142	40	6	8	4	0	0	58	62(27.80)%
9	18th Ward	321	250	38	212	76	13	14	8	0	0	111	71(22.12)%
10	19th Ward	301	213	45	168	48	2	5	5	0	0	60	88(29.24)%
11	1st Ward	234	156	24	132	30	3	2	9	0	0	44	78(33.33)%
12	20th Ward	240	190	30	160	70	6	7	7	0	0	90	50(20.83)%
13	21st Ward	162	107	13	94	18	2	1	3	0	0	24	55(33.95)%
14	22nd Ward	156	117	19	98	29	4	5	0	0	0	38	39(25.00)%
15	23rd Ward	162	126	13	113	14	2	1	3	0	0	20	36(22.22)%
16	24th Ward	195	156	35	121	30	2	5	4	0	0	41	39(20.00)%
17	25th Ward	207	139	18	121	27	1	3	2	0	0	33	68(32.85)%
18	26th Ward	191	146	29	117	17	3	7	4	0	0	31	45(23.56)%
19	27th Ward	154	115	20	95	28	2	5	10	0	0	45	39(25.32)%
20	28th Ward	100	69	18	51	29	1	1	3	0	0	34	31(31.00)%
21	29th Ward	192	151	35	116	30	4	3	6	0	0	43	41(21.35)%
22	2nd Ward	152	119	25	94	23	0	1	3	0	0	27	33(21.71)%
23	30th Ward	186	134	16	118	33	1	3	11	0	0	48	52(27.96)%
24	31st Ward	170	146	26	120	33	5	3	8	0	0	49	24(14.12)%
25	32nd Ward	257	180	25	155	46	5	7	14	0	0	72	77(29.96)%
26	33rd Ward	315	217	35	182	74	6	4	11	0	0	95	98(31.11)%
27	34th Ward	285	227	35	192	64	11	10	14	0	0	99	58(20.35)%
28	35th Ward	374	278	50	228	88	9	10	18	0	0	125	96(25.67)%
29	36th Ward	656	417	63	354	126	11	16	24	1	0	178	239(36.43)%
30	37th Ward	175	109	16	93	22	2	1	7	0	0	32	66(37.71)%
31	38th Ward	131	90	15	75	16	0	0	1	0	0	17	41(31.30)%
32	39th Ward	196	138	30	108	14	0	1	2	0	0	17	58(29.59)%
33	3rd Ward	172	128	22	106	38	2	3	7	0	0	50	44(25.58)%
34	40th Ward	246	193	46	147	30	5	3	7	0	0	45	53(21.54)%
35	41st Ward	177	134	29	105	19	1	3	5	0	0	28	43(24.29)%
36	42nd Ward	172	126	20	106	41	7	7	5	0	0	60	46(26.74)%
37	43rd Ward	152	108	14	94	22	1	7	5	0	0	35	44(28.95)%
38	44th Ward	233	167	16	151	41	4	6	15	0	0	66	66(28.33)%
39	45th ward	280	214	42	172	31	5	3	4	0	0	43	66(23.57)%
40	46th ward	90	69	6	63	15	2	5	4	0	0	26	21(23.33)%
41	47th ward	113	95	19	76	16	0	1	1	0	0	18	18(15.93)%
42	48th ward	194	121	17	104	36	4	4	4	0	0	48	73(37.63)%
43	49th ward	178	113	22	91	24	2	7	5	0	0	38	65(36.52)%
44	4th Ward	158	117	32	85	14	1	2	3	0	0	20	41(25.95)%
45	50th ward	142	107	21	86	22	2	1	7	0	0	32	35(24.65)%
46	51st ward	58	44	10	34	1	0	0	2	0	0	3	14(24.14)%
47	52nd ward	63	31	8	23	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	32(50.79)%
48	53rd ward	4	5	1	4	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	-1(-25.00)%
49	54th ward	9	8	1	7	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1(11.11)%
50	5th Ward	213	153	23	130	30	7	0	7	0	0	44	60(28.17)%
51	6th Ward	204	131	28	103	24	4	3	7	0	0	38	73(35.78)%
52	7th Ward	207	167	33	134	39	3	7	13	0	0	62	40(19.32)%
53	8th Ward	219	169	23	146	51	5	6	5	0	0	67	50(22.83)%
54	9th Ward	195	136	19	117	31	4	8	10	0	0	53	59(30.26)%

Designed, Developed & Maintained by