SADAREM

Government Of Andhra Pradesh
Rural Development Department SERP
SADAREM
(Software for Assessment Of Disabled For Access Rehabilitation and Empowerment)
SADAREM Assessment And Pension status as on:

Mandal Level Report

District : Kurnool Mandal :Nandyal (urban) Village :ALL

Excel Back

S.No	Village	PwDs - ASSESSMENT STATUS				PwDs - PENSIONS COVERED
S.No	Village	Total Applied	Assessed	Rejected (4-6)	Eligible (>40%) (4-5)	Physical Impairment	Visual Impairment	Hearing Impairment	Mental Retardation	Mental Illness	Multiple Disability	Total Pensioners (7+8+9+10+11+12)	Certificate Pendency Percentage
1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14
Total		5,647	4,403	785	3,618	709	68	102	116	1	0	996	1,244(22.03)%
1	10th Ward	97	74	13	61	18	0	1	3	0	0	22	23(23.71)%
2	11th Ward	65	45	16	29	6	0	0	2	0	0	8	20(30.77)%
3	12th Ward	74	52	5	47	12	1	3	1	0	0	17	22(29.73)%
4	13th Ward	82	59	11	48	7	3	4	0	0	0	14	23(28.05)%
5	14th Ward	63	48	4	44	7	1	0	2	0	0	10	15(23.81)%
6	15th Ward	115	75	10	65	15	0	4	4	0	0	23	40(34.78)%
7	16th Ward	100	72	7	65	14	0	3	1	0	0	18	28(28.00)%
8	17th Ward	162	136	35	101	14	3	3	1	0	0	21	26(16.05)%
9	18th Ward	113	83	20	63	12	1	1	4	0	0	18	30(26.55)%
10	19th Ward	65	54	9	45	7	1	0	2	0	0	10	11(16.92)%
11	1st Ward	123	98	15	83	24	2	4	2	0	0	32	25(20.33)%
12	20th Ward	120	83	18	65	9	2	4	2	0	0	17	37(30.83)%
13	21st Ward	223	183	32	151	26	4	5	2	0	0	37	40(17.94)%
14	22nd Ward	103	87	14	73	24	1	4	3	0	0	32	16(15.53)%
15	23rd Ward	159	115	18	97	33	0	1	0	0	0	34	44(27.67)%
16	24th Ward	169	132	32	100	29	0	5	3	0	0	37	37(21.89)%
17	25th Ward	350	300	52	248	45	2	5	5	0	0	57	50(14.29)%
18	26vth Ward	292	248	41	207	22	1	1	7	0	0	31	44(15.07)%
19	27th Ward	147	107	28	79	14	1	0	2	0	0	17	40(27.21)%
20	28th Ward	570	504	72	432	37	5	2	8	0	0	52	66(11.58)%
21	29th Ward	226	182	36	146	26	1	2	1	0	0	30	44(19.47)%
22	2nd Ward	153	136	14	122	19	4	5	8	0	0	36	17(11.11)%
23	30th Ward	207	170	34	136	14	4	2	2	0	0	22	37(17.87)%
24	31st Ward	96	66	10	56	10	4	5	2	0	0	21	30(31.25)%
25	32nd Ward	113	65	12	53	15	3	2	5	0	0	25	48(42.48)%
26	33rd Ward	67	52	7	45	14	2	2	1	0	0	19	15(22.39)%
27	34th Ward	114	88	31	57	15	1	2	2	0	0	20	26(22.81)%
28	35th Ward	75	62	9	53	16	2	3	3	0	0	24	13(17.33)%
29	36th Ward	38	26	11	15	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	12(31.58)%
30	37th Ward	68	45	6	39	15	0	0	6	0	0	21	23(33.82)%
31	38th Ward	134	84	25	59	15	1	4	5	0	0	25	50(37.31)%
32	39th Ward	103	63	9	54	20	2	1	1	0	0	24	40(38.83)%
33	3rd Ward	145	119	17	102	27	1	7	5	1	0	41	26(17.93)%
34	40th Ward	88	61	9	52	11	3	2	4	0	0	20	27(30.68)%
35	4th Ward	133	106	13	93	17	0	1	3	0	0	21	27(20.30)%
36	5th Ward	129	89	13	76	21	0	1	2	0	0	24	40(31.01)%
37	6th Ward	108	75	16	59	21	3	1	3	0	0	28	33(30.56)%
38	7th Ward	200	166	29	137	21	1	2	2	0	0	26	34(17.00)%
39	8th Ward	112	88	13	75	20	3	2	3	0	0	28	24(21.43)%
40	9th Ward	146	105	19	86	16	5	8	4	0	0	33	41(28.08)%

Designed, Developed & Maintained by